By Removal of Obasa as Speaker of LAHA, Political Ambition, and Party Politics
Ibrahim O. Azeez (Guest writer)
The political landscape of Nigeria is one marked by ambition, rivalry, and strategic maneuvering, particularly in the context of Lagos State. The recent developments surrounding the figure of Obasa illustrate how personal ambitions can intertwine with party dynamics and governance structures. This article explores various facets of Obasa’s political journey, reflecting on the themes of contentment, party structure, personal ambition, and the lessons learned from his tenure.
Failure to Understand the Concept of Contentment
At the heart of Obasa’s political narrative is the notion of contentment. In a political environment rife with ambition and competition, understanding contentment becomes crucial. It reflects a sense of fulfilment with one’s role and responsibilities, allowing leaders to focus on serving the public rather than pursuing personal gains. Obasa’s journey suggests a lack of appreciation for this principle, as his political aspirations seemed to overshadow his duties. Combined with a cravings for higher political stature, this led to discontent not only within the political community but also among constituents who felt neglected.
The Structure of the All Progressives Congress (APC)
In Lagos State, the APC represents a formidable and well-structured political machine. The party’s enduring success hinges on its clearly defined hierarchy and guidelines that dictate the conduct of its members. The strength of the APC lies in its ability to maintain a centralized power structure, ensuring that all political calculations are carefully made to promote collective interests over individual ambitions. Obasa, however, appeared to underestimate this structural reality, perceiving the party merely as a platform for his political elevation rather than a cohesive entity meant to uphold governance standards and community well-being.
Misreading Political Favour
Another critical aspect of Obasa’s political rise is the fleeting nature of political favour. Many in the political arena, including Obasa, often mistake this favour as a mark of personal merit rather than a temporary alignment of circumstances. His tenure can be seen as a product of unique political calculations that favoured him at a particular moment. However, failing to recognize this nuance led him to believe in his own indispensability. Understanding that political favour can shift with changing tides and alliances is crucial for any politician’s longevity.
Overriding the Interests of the Governance Advisory Council
Politicians often tread a fine line between personal ambition and collective governance. However, Obasa’s calculation that his own interests superseded those of the Governance Advisory Council proved detrimental. This body exists to provide strategic advice and support for better governance, and disregarding their counsel not only undermined the governance process but also alienated key stakeholders in the political framework. The lack of synergy between Obasa and the council showcased a flawed understanding of collaborative governance and its significance in achieving sustainable political goals.
Personal Interests Above General Interest
A pivotal reason for Obasa’s removal from his position can be attributed to his prioritization of personal interests over those of the party and public. Effective political leaders are expected to navigate their aspirations without compromising the welfare of the people they serve. In Obasa’s case, his focus on personal ambition led to a divide within party ranks and dissatisfaction among constituents. This misalignment ultimately backfired, as it alienated supporters and created an environment ripe for his downfall.
Lessons for the Political Landscape
Obasa’s story serves as a cautionary tale within the APC and the broader political landscape in Nigeria. It reinforces the notion that while ambition is a natural component of political life, it must be balanced with a keen awareness of collective goals and community responsibilities. Future leaders must strive to navigate their ambitions in a manner that aligns with the broader interests of their parties and the populace, fostering a culture of collaboration rather than individualism in political spaces.
In conclusion, the political architecture of Lagos State under the APC remains a complex interplay of individual ambitions and party politics. Obasa’s trajectory underscores the necessity for political actors to embrace contentment, respect established structures, recognize the temporary nature of political favour, and prioritize collective interests above personal ones. These lessons resonate beyond Lagos State, offering guidance for the entire Nigerian political milieu.
Ibrahim O. Azeez.
P.R.O Lagos State University(2011/2012 Academic session)
